Comments on: Why O-RAN sync monitoring needs AI/ML https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/ Covering 5G technology, systems, infrastructure and wireless design and development. Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:23:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.4 By: Ramana Reddy https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-42108 Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:23:17 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-42108 In reply to Amit Palkar.

Hi Amit,
Thanks for going through the article. I agree with your views. Regards-Ramana

]]> By: Ramana Reddy https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-42107 Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:21:54 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-42107 In reply to Sunil.

Hi Sunil,
Thanks. Yes RIC seems to be the way forward to bring in some intelligence to improve Sync KPIs. Regards-Ramana

]]> By: Ramana Reddy https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-42106 Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:20:50 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-42106 In reply to Geo Vadakkan.

Hi Geo,
Thanks for going through the article. I concur with your views. Regards-Ramana

]]> By: Amit Palkar https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41933 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:32:09 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41933 Excellent Article, Ramana … The security part along with the option to have RIC (with AI/ML models) will definitely play a part in mitigating the threats which you have mentioned.

]]> By: Sunil https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41789 Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:04:57 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41789 Well-articulated and easy to visualize. Thank you. Hoping AI/ML technologies would Detect & Analyze – Grasp, with that RIC algos could take corrective actions.

]]> By: Geo Vadakkan https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41555 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 19:14:32 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41555 Ramana Reddy, I highly value your dedication and thorough analysis of the KPI challenges encountered by Open RAN operators. I concur that achieving consistent performance in Open RAN deployments requires accurate synchronization, connecting devices to UTC through IEEE PTP/SyncE-based clocks. As AI/ML advancements oversee numerous Open RAN devices, ensuring network reliability and responding to failures become imperative.

]]> By: Ramana https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41503 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:22:19 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41503 In reply to DJ72.

no NTP is not considered an equalent backup for GM failures. NTP in the picture was represented for controllers which doesnt need PTP timesync while PTP is always needed for sync on DU(s). and RU(s)

]]> By: Ramana https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41502 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 04:20:22 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41502 In reply to Sudhee.

Thanks Sudhee

]]> By: DJ72 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-41310 Mon, 07 Aug 2023 14:35:06 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-41310 Is this dependant on NTP to cascade timing out to Cell Site RU’s if Grandmaster Clock/GNSS fails (see NTP in diagram above)?

]]> By: Sudhee https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/why-o-ran-sync-monitoring-needs-ai-ml/#comment-40947 Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:21:56 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=19192#comment-40947 This is one of the best article I have come accross in recent times. Keep up the good work. Keep exploring.

]]>